We believe Web 2.0 is not a revolution as much as an evolution. Simply put, the web is finally leveraging standards (CSS, JavaScript, etc) to deliver engaging, interactive and integrated content in ways that allow users to focus on the task and the customer rather than the interface. That is correct, Web 2.0 is an approach that uses standards-based technology (Ajax, Flash, Java) to deliver a better user experience, period. I know… you have heard this before… The slick sales team from XYZ Enterprise Solutions sold your management the last bill of goods on the 360 customer view implementation model using their ‘Integrated XYZ on every desktop’ promise. Unfortunately, the promise often was delivered with complex proprietary software based on UI technology decisions made 5-6 years ago. Worse yet, in order to integrate the enterprise solution, a majority of project effort was often spent on building web services to legacy data rather than focusing on custom tailored UI’s specific for the key user tasks. Web 2.0 thinking gives us the opportunity to refocus our efforts on usability to design the tailored solutions users have been requesting all along.

Simply put, enterprise software vendors have too many masters and a flawed business model when it comes to usability. Consider this; the basic business drivers influencing design decisions in these companies is often contrary to good usability. Want a tough job? Work as a usability practitioner in one of the enterprise software companies.

Imagine yourself, the head of sales, going into the CEO of XYZ Enterprise Software and recommending elimination of 30% of the low usage features requested by various customers and cutting functionality by another 25% to help make this year’s revenue numbers. This just will not happen. Instead, more features will get built, upgrade revenue will be collected, and the poor sap ???? trying to enter his time report into the recently upgraded self-service web-based time sheet system spends additional 15 minutes each week just trying to ensure he gets paid. Multiply this extra 15 minutes a week by the other 20,000 employees and the numbers become staggering.

What about those customer representatives in the call center? Are they really more productive with your new web-based application? Sometimes, the answer is yes, but often, I hear whispers from the users that the ‘Old’ client-server system was faster and more efficient than the new web-based application. Here in-lies the problem. Client-server and windows applications just don’t sell. CTO’s want zero-footprint applications to lower their deployment costs. This is a serious issue as companies can spend upwards of $1 million dollars just to roll out software patches onto thousands of machines. Browser-based applications deliver extremely low deployment costs…but until now at a steep operational cost, due to their point-click-wait behavior. Don’t believe me? Let’s do a test. Remove all your favorite IDEs (Visual Studio, Eclipse, JBuilder, Dreamweaver) and try building your next major application in a web-based IDE. Change a line a code, press submit, wait, scroll back to that section of code, repeat. Oh, by the way, the ‘Back’ button doesn’t work and don’t plan on having any ‘Undo’ capabilities. My point is we don’t eat our own dog food. Now go back and enjoy your favorite IDE.

New sales of enterprise software are dependent on smooth, quick implementations. Essentially the pitch at the executive level is often something like this: ‘We’ve figured out the industry best practices so you need to adapt your business to be in line with how our software works’. When the realities of a true project come into play, software vendors focus on meeting the needs of the client and since each client is usually a bit different the entire design approach becomes based on possibility instead of probability. Essentially, the thinking is ‘Let’s make this flexible so the next client installation goes more smoothly’. While this can be a good thing, it often complicates the user interface resulting in lower user productivity.

Designing a Web 2.0 interface does give us a unique opportunity to fix what’s broken with most enterprise software today. Regardless of whether you are trying to implement the latest XYZ’s enterprise web solution or are building a custom web-based application, taking a Web 2.0 approach will likely make for a better user experience.

The Web 2.0 Approach
Since Web 2.0 is an approach, here are four characteristics I would focus on to improve the user experience.

1. Less Implementation, more content. Web 1.0 was about bringing data to the desktop, often via portals. This often resulted in a ‘My XYZ’ page with a hundred links. Great. Now the user has a 1 in 100 chance of making the right choice. These systems were flexible and certainly better than logging into 5 disparate systems, but how much better are they than just creating a static HTML page with those same links or a “Main Menu’ in the old mainframe days? The web 2.0 approach will dispense with portletviews and provide integrated content tailored to how the user would actually use it. It will break the political boundaries within the company and provide rich contextual views so that users can make fluid decisions. Long gone will be the days of ‘We cannot give you access to the data, but you can link to us…is that ok?’ A great example of this approach iswww.zillow.com where you can view real estate information from a customer view, not from a realtor view www.realtor.com.

2. Rich interaction…where needed. I like Rich, engaging interfaces when they work the way a human works. Unfortunately, many of them to date are loaded with ‘surprises’ and new learning experiences most users are not willing to tolerate. On the other hand, when an interface works like the real world, most people are happy. Take for instance www.kayak.com. This travel site adjusts the selection of flights when I move the sliders on the left. My stereo works the same way. Move the volume slider and I enjoy more sound. No learning, no waiting, no back button.

3. Community collaboration. We’re social creatures. Hang out at a mall and watch people for a day. You’ll learn a lot. When users look at your data, they often desire validation from others. Web 2.0 applications likewww.flickr.com play on this natural human behavior to build decentralized social networks. That’s correct; your new Web 2.0 application will actually embrace feedback from everyone in your company with a bottom up approach rather than a top-down approach. This is not a radical as it seems. Most key business knowledge is already stored at the bottom level in spreadsheets and emails rather then the company’s ERP system. Just integrate your application to embrace this phenomenon.

4. Purpose Built. Visit a construction site and hang out with a carpenter. You will likely find a selection of saws for specific types of jobs. The web allows us to create a 1-to-1 relationship with the user. Know them, build just what they need and they will be happy. Avoid ‘Boil the Ocean’ designs that try to meet the needs of every user but rarely meet the needs of any. This approach requires clear vision and strong leadership. Products likewww.gmail.com are forging the path with simple but effective solutions. ‘I need to check my email, I don’t have much time and I don’t want spam.’ Done. Thanks Google.

Over the years, I am continuously asked the most basic question: What makes great software? After some reflection my answer is quite simple.

1. A crisp understanding of the problem
2. A deep understanding of your users and their tasks
3. Design strategies that work the way humans work
4. A small team with passion and skills to solve the problem
5. An environment where people are truly productive

Nope. Web 2.0 didn’t make the list. Why? In short, long after Web 2.0 has evolved into Web 3.0, etc. items 1-5 will still likely be true and valid. Until then, try using the Web 2.0 approach along with the basics of good design and you may just be able to apply a handy Botox treatment to spruce up the usability of your enterprise applications. After all, giving a 360 degree view of your customer should at least look good ????